<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deliberative votes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://masterofmeetings.com/index2/deliberative-votes/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://masterofmeetings.com/index2/deliberative-votes</link>
	<description>A blog about everything to do with meetings, minutes, and governance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 00:38:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol Jones</title>
		<link>http://masterofmeetings.com/index2/deliberative-votes/comment-page-1#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 00:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterofmeetings.com/?p=247#comment-243</guid>
		<description>Dear Sir

I think that you might be wrong regarding a second or casting vote.  The &quot;or&quot; is used disjunctively. My understanding is that a Chairman can exercise a first vote, and then where there is an equality of votes he can cast a second vote which has the effect of breaking the tie.  The &quot;or casting vote&quot; means that where a Chairman has not cast a first vote, and there is an equality of votes, he has the power to break the tie by using his casting vote.  In these circumstances it is not a &quot;second&quot; vote but a &quot;casting&quot; vote.

I work in Local Government and this is how we operate it, but I&#039;d be interested to have your views. 

Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Sir</p>
<p>I think that you might be wrong regarding a second or casting vote.  The &#8220;or&#8221; is used disjunctively. My understanding is that a Chairman can exercise a first vote, and then where there is an equality of votes he can cast a second vote which has the effect of breaking the tie.  The &#8220;or casting vote&#8221; means that where a Chairman has not cast a first vote, and there is an equality of votes, he has the power to break the tie by using his casting vote.  In these circumstances it is not a &#8220;second&#8221; vote but a &#8220;casting&#8221; vote.</p>
<p>I work in Local Government and this is how we operate it, but I&#8217;d be interested to have your views. </p>
<p>Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

